Innovations in Business Immigration

By Daniel Levine
Last Updated
Dec 16, 2025
9 min read
Main image - Innovations in Business Immigration

Sometimes it feels that certain sectors of legal innovation grab all of the attention, especially regarding new solutions in corporate law, litigation, tax, and intellectual property. But aside from the big 4 accounting firms incorporating immigration law departments into their service offerings, few solutions move the needle when it comes to innovating immigration.

Located in a beautifully repurposed house on Bloor Street West in Toronto Ontario, the team at Sobirovs Law Firm (https://www.sobirovs.com/) offers an entrepreneurial approach when helping clients abroad bring their businesses to Canada.

The Sobirovs team hails from the four corners of the world, bringing with them a multilingual and multi-jurisdictional experience to the practice of immigration.

The success of the firm is due in large part to the managing partner, Rakhmad Sobirov, who has law degrees from Uzbekistan, Hungary and Canada. Working with a number of leading law firms throughout the world during his career, he has managed to successfully merge his experiences in corporate, international aviation and intellectual property law into a unique offering for immigrants into Canada.

What intrigued me, perhaps more than anything else, was the firm’s personal investment in helping their clients help themselves. Recently, Sobirovs launched ImmigrationShop.ca (https://www.immigrationshop.ca/), a teaching tool designed to help new immigrants manage much of the immigration process themselves. As Sobirov himself explains, “ImmigrationShop is unique in the sense that it allows us, the lawyers, to share our legal knowledge with the general public. Rather than saying “pay me and I will do it for you”, we are saying “come and learn AND do it with us!””

Using videos, consultations and lawyer application reviews, the ImmigrationShop workshops offer a “hand-holding” approach for potential immigrants. While there is a cost associated with watching the videos and taking the online workshops, immigrants undertaking the process themselves can save thousands in potential legal fees.

I had the chance to sit down with Rakhmad Sobirov and probe the ImmigrationShop a little bit deeper. I think his responses reflect a positive trend in lawyers taking initiative to create unique business models and revenue sources, all while increasing client value and satisfaction.

How long have you been practicing law?

I have been a lawyer in Uzbekistan since 2003, but have been practicing law as an Ontario lawyer since 2012. When I immigrated to Canada in 2006, I decided to go back to law school from the beginning and study the common law system in order to become a full-fledged Canadian lawyer.

Immigration law is constantly changing, and businesses, domestic and international clients rely on experienced lawyers to help navigate the complex immigration laws and regulations. We effectively facilitate the international relocation of executives, investors, high-skilled workers and their accompanying family members, starting from temporary visas for business visits to Canada to eventually obtain Canadian permanent residency or citizenship.

We realized there is a large market for unique, tailor-made and creative legal solutions for foreign business owners, investors and high-net-worth individuals interested in bringing their businesses and families to Canada.

It’s a win-win strategy for us as Canadian lawyers who ourselves immigrated to Canada. We have a deep understanding of the challenges that are often faced by immigrants or foreign businesses entering new markets. On one hand, we are contributing to the Canadian economy by bringing in capital and expertise from outside of Canada. On the other hand, we are helping established families from outside Canada make a new home and build a better future for themselves and their children.

We understand our clients very well. Our practice is best described as an “immigrant to immigrant approach.”

Overall the field of immigration law remains pretty conservative with few novel solutions available for law firms or their clients. It is dominated by the “do-it-for-you” model. That is, you hire a lawyer/immigration consultant/Quebec notary and pay him/her, and the service provider does all immigration applications for you.

What we see in immigration law more often is the danger of the unauthorized and unlicensed practice of immigration law by “ghost consultants,” “travel/visa agents” and so-called “helpers.” They would complete all applications as if the applicant were doing it himself/herself. There are plenty of horror stories of such shady practices and we want our clients to trust us and not worry about being swindled. With the launch of ImmigrationShop, we hope to tackle this problem by educating potential visa and immigration applicants.

What inspired the creation of ImmigrationShop? How long has it been in development? What do you hope your clients (and future clients) will get out of it?

First, we have deep knowledge of the common repetitive inquiries that people ask us about immigrating to Canada. We constantly receive queries asking “How to come to Canada as a student/worker/tourist/businessman?” or “How to claim refugee status in Canada?” We identified a certain level of repetitiveness in our practice.

Second, based on these findings, we wanted to consolidate our expertise into useful material in order to reference and share multiple/unlimited times. We realized that our knowledge had scalability and can serve for the benefit of future visa applicants.

Third, we realized that interested potential immigrants living outside of Canada could not always afford the legal fees of Canadian immigration lawyers. That could be one of the reasons why these people go to unlicensed service providers or complete the immigration applications themselves using the information they find online. Obviously, in so doing there is a level of risk involved.

Analyzing all these circumstances, we thought “why don’t we, the licensed and experienced Canadian lawyers, empower the applicants by transferring our knowledge directly to them? We could do it by transferring our expertise, tools and tips, and train those applicants on how to prepare strong visa and immigration applications. In a way, we would share our expertise with them at a fraction of our standard legal fees.”

While many visa applications can be done by the applicant personally without involving any intermediary, the challenge is to have the right information, experience and tools (which most visa applicants lack). We help applicants become better educated, more powerful, and well-equipped to prepare their own applications, while at the same time avoiding the pitfalls of ghost consultants and scammers.

We then developed detailed training workshops in which we give the candidates the necessary tools to increase their chances of success in their visa or immigration applications. It took us almost 2 years to develop the concept and it takes us 3-4 months to prepare one detailed visa workshop. We are constantly working on creating new workshops.

You are encouraging clients to undertake much of the immigration process themselves, as opposed to seeking out a lawyer at the outset. Why? What effect do you think this will have on your practice?

We are not removing the traditional legal services from the spectrum. For complicated immigration matters, clients are encouraged to hire an immigration lawyer in a traditional way. But for clients with limited means or preferring to complete applications by themselves, we offer workshops which save them money.

After completing the relevant workshop, candidates can complete their immigration applications based on our knowledge and guidelines. Taking the study permit workshop as an example, we offer legal consultation at a discounted rate and can review completed application packages of our students on a limited scope retainer before anything is submitted to the Canadian immigration authorities.

In a traditional “do-it-for-you” model, a client would pay around $2000 for a visitor visa/student visa application done by a Canadian immigration lawyer. This price covers the lawyer’s overhead costs which are built in the lawyer’s legal fees.

We removed the administrative costs and transferred all the savings to the client. We call this the “do-it-with-you” model. It saves candidates money without compromising the application’s quality, thereby maximizing client value at a very affordable rate.

For study permit, our workshop only charges $99. The clients/students can get all the necessary information, step-by-step video instructions, template documents and sample application packages, which enables them to complete everything themselves. If the student has any questions, he/she can get a consultation for just $149, and a professional review of the completed application package for just $249. The total cost of one visa application would be less than $500.

The creation of ImmigrationShop has an implied mission of addressing the access to justice issue within the Canadian immigration system. Indeed, for people with limited financial means, many of them could not afford traditional legal services and may be left without any access to legal help. When it comes to navigating the Canadian immigration process, it is better to have the right knowledge and tools offered by licensed Canadian lawyers than to rely on your own Internet research, friends’ stories or ghost agents’ services.

Are you the first immigration law firm to offer a solution like ImmigrationShop?

To our knowledge YES! What we are trying to do has never been done by any other traditional law firm. We are turning our immigrant candidates into immigration professionals for a very specific period of time and with a very specific purpose.

What other new/unique technologies and solutions are you using at Sobirovs Law? Are there new solutions on the horizon?

While new specific projects remain our secret, I can tell that we are maximizing the utilization of technologies in our daily practice. For example, starting from basic paperless environment in our office and continuing with using automation in client intake and document drafting, we can pass more value to our customers. Tools like Calendly, amoCRM and CosmoLex (to name a few) have certainly helped streamline a lot of the administrative components of running our firm.

We constantly search for new solutions that would allow us to achieve the goals above. That’s why we got interested in MinuteBox, which allows us to maintain client’s minute books electronically. Because we deal with business owners and investors, we also provide basic incorporation and company organization services. We can use MinuteBox to maintain corporate documents easily and that saves us time and client’s money.

What you should do now

Blog

Related Articles
Discover insights and tips for legal professionals
Oct 17, 2025
3 min read
New requirements for corporate record keeping under Bill C-86 – Amendments to the CBCA

On December 13, 2018, Bill C-86 received Royal Assent, thereby amending certain provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act (“CBCA”).

The updated provisions include new record keeping requirements for private companies incorporated under the CBCA. As of June 13, 2019. The updates affect those with “significant control” of a company defined as:

Section 2.1(1)

  • (a) an individual who has any of the following interests or rights, or any combination of them, in respect of a significant number of shares of the corporation:
    • (i) the individual is the registered holder of them,
    • (ii) the individual is the beneficial owner of them, or
    • (iii) the individual has direct or indirect control or direction over them;
  • (b) an individual who has any direct or indirect influence that, if exercised, would result in control in fact of the corporation; or
  • (c) an individual to whom prescribed circumstances apply.

A “significant number of shares” is further defined as:

Section 2.1(3)

  • (a) any number of shares that carry 25% or more of the voting rights attached to all of the corporation’s outstanding voting shares; or
  • (b) any number of shares that is equal to 25% or more of all of the corporation’s outstanding shares measured by fair market value.

Summary

Private CBCA corporations must now maintain a register of all individuals who fit the above description, and include in the register the names, birth dates, residence (for tax purposes) and other required data.

Shareholders are now obligated to provide true and accurate information when requested by the corporation.

At least once per financial year, the corporation must review and update this information. Once the corporation is aware of any changes, it has 15 days in order to amend the register accordingly. Failure to properly update the information can result in fines of up to $5,000. However, directors or shareholders knowingly providing false information can result in fines of up to $200,000 and/or six months of imprisonment.

The CBCA requirements ensure that corporations (or the law firms that manage the records for those corporations) must undertake a greater number of tasks each year to ensure the corporate records’ compliance.

The process of updating minute book records will be daunting and tedious, especially if the information is stored in physical minute books binders. Document generation tools and clearly organized cloud-based data and databases can make compliance with the new requirements more manageable.

While the new requirements apply only to privately held CBCA corporations, it is certainly possible that the provincial legislatures will debate and perhaps adopt similar requirements.

At MinuteBox, we have already begun internally testing some new features (to be released in 2019) built specifically to support lawyers and clerks through this process.

Oct 17, 2025
4 min read
What do we do now and what happens next? (Part 1 of 2)

This piece is a list of suggestions and helpful solutions in order to help us, as a legal community, get through the tumultuous times, and ensure we are in the best possible position when this is all over (it will happen… I swear!).

Here we are. The vast majority of lawyers are working from home, trying to find a sense of normalcy in a world that changes by the hour (sometimes less). I always knew the legal industry would undergo a cataclysmic change, but never in my wildest thoughts did I envision a global pandemic would be the catalyst.

Let’s get one thing clear. There is no single-source rule book for how we, as a profession, undertake our role in the current circumstances. These are uncharted waters and we are all navigating them for the first time. Good luck!

But I firmly believe lawyers are smart and resourceful. They will find ways to provide services to clients and ensure the job gets done.

Even at times when we feel helpless as professionals, there are steps lawyers and law firms can take to ensure our industry makes it through this crisis:

Communicate with your clients: Ensure they are well accommodated. A simple phone call goes a long way to build goodwill. In times of uncertainty, “Hi, how are you?” shows concern and empathy. Find out what kind of support they need and offer your services, if you can.

Communicate with other lawyers: One big (normal) fear we may have is that other lawyers are farther along in their management of this crisis than we are. This can lead to uncertainty, anxiety, paranoia and doubt. Rest assured, every lawyer is feeling the stress and everyone is, to at least some degree, underprepared for a situation like this. Speaking with colleagues will not only help settle your thoughts, but may also introduce you to some novel solutions they have uncovered which can help your practice as well.

Explore what doesn’t work: What PAIN POINTS are you specifically feeling now when it comes to your ability to practice? What is not working and what needs fixing. What really grinds your gears when it comes to your practice? These might not be identified immediately, but over the coming weeks, begin to explore which processes are important and which are dead weight.

Take stock of your processes: Do a little process mapping. How were things done before the current health crisis? How are they done now? What can be improved and what was waste? Process mapping for different parts of your practice can help zero-in on areas that can be improved.

Take advantage of government resources: The federal and provincial governments have been providing capital for businesses and individuals. It is important to inform your clients about what’s available, but also determine if you or your firm is eligible. Find out if you are eligible for the Temporary Wage Subsidy (TWS), the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS), the Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA) and the Canada Emergency Response Benefit program (CERB).

Don’t be afraid to push the envelope when it comes to novel ways to practice: Remember, above all else your duty is to provide service to your clients (in a safe, ethical and secure manner). Think outside the box and be a trailblazer!

Embrace the quiet: Lawyers are notoriously busy, always working on client deadlines (whether actual or self-imposed). Without a doubt, those times will return, guaranteed! But in the meantime, enjoy working fewer hours. Embrace a 9-5 work routine. Take an extended lunch at the kitchen table. Watch an episode of the Price is Right (it’s good for the soul!).

Take the time to be honest with yourself: Anxiety, nervousness and fear are human emotions. And although we sometimes work superhuman hours, we must find time to cope and express our emotions to ourselves and to others.

As lawyers, we are made to feel we have all the answers all the time. It’s alright to take a little bit of time to find the best approach to provide optimal service to your clients and yourself.

If you remember nothing else, remember Rule # 1: Stay healthy. The rest we can figure out together!

Oct 17, 2025
4 min read
The Legal Technology Sales Triangle

Absent double-monitor computers and the ability to send emails on smartphones, in many ways lawyers continue to practise the same way they have for generations. The legal industry has oft been described as the last great mature industry to modernize. However, growing pressures from clients and stiffer competition from new legal service providers are compelling law firms to slowly introduce new processes and technologies in order to internally increase work efficiency and externally create client value.

Legal technology can be divided into two tags: necessary and nuisance.

Necessary technologies, the smaller of the two categories, are tools a modern law firm needs in order to function. Photocopiers, email and the telephone are just three examples.

Alternatively, nuisance focused technologies, where the vast majority of legal technology falls under, provide solutions that are faster, better and cheaper than existing methods and processes. These solutions alleviate real nuisances, but are not required to practise law. For example, AI powered due diligence software “reads” contracts and parses out key information. However, teams of junior associates can perform the very same task, albeit at a slower rate and higher price. Nuisance alleviating technologies are value-added solutions that law firms should strongly consider implementing but are reticent to adopt.

For law firms, the consideration to adopt nuisance alleviating technologies is based on three factors: the simplicity of the technology, the product or service’s ease of use, and how quickly the financial returns are realized. These considerations, taken together, form what we at MinuteBox call the “Legal Technology Sales Triangle.” The degree to which each node is considered and satisfied may help determine whether a law firm will adopt a new nuisance alleviating technology.

Simple

Make sure your nuisance alleviating technology is simple in the eyes of lawyers. While outsiders see an industry inching towards modernization, lawyers feel that they’re on a bullet train moving at top speed. Understanding lawyers’ perspectives is essential when presenting new technologies or innovations to law firms.  Too much change too quickly is risky, and lawyers, as practitioners of risk aversion, will more often than not opt to remain on familiar turf.

So when pitching nuisance alleviating technologies to lawyers ask yourself the following questions:

  1. Is my presentation too technical?
  2. Will lawyers understand what I am trying to do?
  3. Is this a tiny step or radical step in terms of how lawyers and law firms work?

Easy-To-Use

Many lawyers have been practicing the same way for decades and are prone to reverting back to tried and true processes whenever new technologies are introduced. Familiarity with tools and techniques creates a pervasive stickiness. Even though some steps in a legal process may be redundant, lawyers still follow each step. Their individual technique works for them.

Therefore, as a starting point, any new technology must be as easy or easier to use than whatever techniques or solutions the lawyers are currently using. That means if the current process takes five steps, any new solutions must be five steps or fewer. It doesn’t matter how complex the new step; a mouse click, an extra button press, even excessive load times all repel lawyers back to their preferred techniques.

New nuisance alleviating solutions must also be out-of-the box ready. Law firms are busy and are looking for end-to-end solutions that don’t require a lot of onboarding on their part.

The one exception to the easy-to-use requirement is if each additional step yields exponential returns. For every additional button press, mouse click or lag time, the financial return must be high.

Instant Return

The sooner a firm can see financial returns from the adoption of a technology the faster that firm will adopt it. For the vast majority of law firms, strategic decisions are made by the senior leadership, often composed of very senior partners nearing retirement. There is thus a lack of incentive for some decision makers to adopt high cost technologies which only yield returns in the distant future.

While some new technologies can positively impact a firm’s financial position in the long term, the immediate value in the eyes of the decision makers is limited. Instead, senior decision makers will be more inclined to invest in technologies that may be less impactful but have immediate financial returns.

The Legal Technology Sales Triangle is by no means a comprehensive tool when it comes to selling nuisance alleviating technologies to law firms. Yet it adds a sense of perspective for how most firms operate and the considerations they weigh when deciding to adopt impactful technologies.

You're subscribed!
Stay tuned for updates delivered to your inbox.
We couldn’t

process your request
Please double-check your email and try again.
Subscribe
to our newsletter
Stay updated with the latest news and insights from MinuteBox delivered straight to your inbox.